The government is ready to put evolution on the primary curriculum for the first time after years of lobbying by senior scientists.

The schools minister, Diana Johnson, has confirmed the plans will be included in a blueprint for a new curriculum to be published in the next few weeks.

It follows a letter signed by scientists and science educators calling on the government to make the change after draft versions of the new curriculum failed to mention evolution explicitly.

The open letter sent in July to Ed Balls, the children’s secretary, was signed by 25 leading figures from science and education, who urged the government to rewrite the curriculum before it was finalised.

Among the signatories were the Oxford University evolutionary biologist Richard Dawkins, three Nobel laureates and Reverend Professor Michael Reiss, the professor of science education at the Institute of Education in London.

The letter expressed alarm that the theory of evolution through natural selection, which it describes as “one of the most important ideas underlying biological science”, was ignored in the revamped curriculum.

“We consider its inclusion vital,” the letter said.

In a letter to the British Humanist Association (BHA), which has co-ordinated the campaign for evolution on the curriculum, Johnson confirmed it would be in the final draft. Pupils will start with simple concepts of change, adaptation and natural selection illustrated by the evolution of fish to amphibians to mammals, for example.

Andrew Copson, director of education at the BHA, said: “Evolution is arguably the most important concept underlying the life sciences. Providing children with an understanding of it an early age will help lay the foundations for a surer scientific understanding later on. I congratulate the government for taking on board the contributions from so many supporters of science education.”

The government asked its primary school adviser, Sir Jim Rose, to overhaul the curriculum for four- to 11-year-olds last year. His report in the spring set out widespread reforms to the curriculum.

It recommended stripping away the 11 subjects primaries must cover by law, and replacing them with six “areas of learning”, including history, science and geography. In the next few weeks, the results of the consultation on Rose’s plans will be published along with the government’s response.

Copson said the teaching of evolution was particularly important in the wake of a recent survey commissioned by the British Council, which found that 54% of Britons agreed with the view that “evolutionary theories should be taught in science lessons in schools together with other possible perspectives, such as intelligent design and creationism”.

Johnson said: “Learning about evolution is an important part of science education, and pupils already learn about it at secondary school.

“The draft primary curriculum was designed to cover evolution as an implicit part of the new programme of learning for science and technology. After a public consultation on the plans – which took in the views of parents, teachers, the public, subject experts and other interested parties – it is expected that evolution will be covered explicitly in the new primary curriculum. The responses from the consultation will be published shortly.”

Buzz up!vote now

Arch­bishop Sil­vano Tomasi

Yes­ter­day may have been http://www.blasphemyday.com/“>Inter­na­tional Blas­phemy Day but this story is no joke.  In response to accu­sa­tions of cov­er­ing up child abuse and vio­lat­ing many pro­vi­sions of the http://www.unicef.org/crc/“>Con­ven­tion on the Rights of the Child, Catholic Arch­bishop Sil­vano Tomasi sought to counter-attack and deflect criticism.

Accord­ing the

In a defi­ant and provoca­tive state­ment, issued fol­low­ing a meet­ing of the UN human rights coun­cil in Geneva, the Holy See said the major­ity of Catholic clergy who com­mit­ted such acts were not pae­dophiles but homo­sex­u­als attracted to sex with ado­les­cent males.

[He] defended its record by claim­ing that “avail­able research” showed that only 1.5%-5% of Catholic clergy were involved in child sex abuse.

He also quoted sta­tis­tics from the Chris­t­ian Sci­en­tist Mon­i­tor news­pa­per to show that most US churches being hit by child sex abuse alle­ga­tions were Protes­tant and that sex­ual abuse within Jew­ish com­mu­ni­ties was common.

The Catholic Church has been plagued by http://www.npr.org/news/specials/priests/ “>pledges to clean up its act.  How­ever, these things con­tinue to haunt the church.

Of course, Mr. Tomasi is right about one thing, the Catholic Church cer­tainly has other things that need to be cleaned up.  For instance, there was the case ear­lier this year in Brazil where

Tomasi’s state­ment in defi­ance of the UN Human Rights Coun­cil is fur­ther com­pounded by the asser­tions about the moles­ters not being pedophiles, but homo­sex­u­als who just hap­pened to be attracted to ‘ado­les­cent males’.  This is a fine route for fur­ther per­se­cu­tion of gays world­wide, and only demon­strates that with peo­ple like this reach­ing the level of Arch­bishop, per­haps the Catholic Church does have more to worry about than sex abuse scandals.

Find more arti­cles about clergy abuse at http://ritualabuse.us/research/clergy-abuse/” target=”_blank”>S.M.A.R.T. — Rit­ual Abuse Pages

Related Posts:

• Is Amer­ica A Joke? No.
• Lloyd I. Sederer, MD: What are the Wounds of War?
• Lin­coln Mitchell: The Police­man, the Pres­i­dent, the Pro­fes­sor, an Apol­ogy, and a Round of Beers
• Paul Stan­ley, Ten­nessee State Sen­a­tor, Quits After Affair With 22-Year-Old Intern
• The Triv­i­al­iza­tion of The Pres­i­dency: Obama Becomes Oprah

Share and Enjoy:

• 

• 

• 

• 

• 

• 

• 

• 

• 

• 

• 

• 

ONLY 5% of Catholic clergy are actively involved in child sex. WTF!!